Risk and safety in practice
نویسنده
چکیده
A very recent Canadian paper by Shelagh McRae presents the story of a heart patient of 74 who had been stabilized on the same dose of digoxin for many years; then on a routine control visit he was suddenly found to have a raised serum digoxin level. The most likely causes of such a problem such as overdosage or renal failure were ruled out, and the matter remained a mystery until the patient informed the doctor that he had been taking Siberian ginseng. Once he abandoned the ginseng, his serum digoxin returned to normal. A few months later, when he took ginseng again, the problem recurred. The author speculates that some component of the ginseng may have been converted to digoxin in vitro, interfered with digoxin excretion or caused a false serum assay result. Rightly, she warned physicians to be alert to the possibility that a patient's self-medication with 'alternative' remedies can lead to troublesome interactions. Ginseng is a familiar problem in this respect. Cardiovascular and oestrogen-like effects have been attributed to it, and it has on more than one occasion deranged prescribed drug therapy in one way or another. The basic problem is undoubtedly that ginseng preparations usually fall outside the scope of drug control and there is as a result no certainty as to their composition. As that grand expert in the problems of complementary therapies, Prof. E. Ernst has pointed out, the term 'ginseng' can refer to any of several Panax species, as well as to so-called ginseng species from Siberia, Romania or Brazil which are in fact rather different plants. No-one knows what a given 'ginseng' preparation contains; one investigator known to this Journal found a so-called ginseng tonic to consist of turnips floating in cheap wine. Anyone who is rash enough to take ginseng, especially alongside prescribed medication, needs to be warned that he is taking quite a step into the unknown.
منابع مشابه
بررسی عوامل مرتبط با رعایت اصول ایمنی در کار با داروهای شیمیدرمانی در کارکنان پرستاری بیمارستانهای دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اهواز
Background and aims: Many antineoplastic agents are known to be carcinogenic and mutagenic. Nurses are the main groups at risk to these drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine of associated factors with safety principles precaution of working with chemotherapeutic agents among nursing staff. Methods: This is a descriptive-analytical study. Based on the census method, 59 nurses and hea...
متن کاملThe Rise of Patient Safety-II: Should We Give Up Hope on Safety-I and Extracting Value From Patient Safety Incidents?; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Who could disagree with the seemingly common-sense reasoning that: “We must learn from the things that go wrong.”? Despite major investments to improve patient safety, relatively few evaluations demonstrate convincing reductions in risk, harm, serious error or death. This disappointing trajectory of improvement from learning from errors or Safety-I as it is sometimes known has led some research...
متن کاملA Cross-sectional Study of Road Traffic Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Emergency Department Staff
Background and Purpose: Emergency Department (ED) staff are frequently faced with road traffic injury victims and also play role as various road users. This study was conducted to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practices of ED staff towards road safety at referral trauma hospitals of Tabriz. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020 in the referral traum...
متن کاملEffectiveness of Safety Training on Knowledge and Practice of Operating Room Personnel Regarding Fire Prevention
Background and Objectives: Fire is an inherent and permanent risk in the operating room and the prevention of it in the operating room require awareness of risks and effective communication between its staffs. Thus the purpose of this study is to determine the awareness and the practice of the operating room staff about fire prevention and to determine the effectiveness of safe...
متن کاملIt Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’
متن کاملSafety I to Safety II: A Paradigm Shift or More Work as Imagined?; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
In their editorial, Mannion and Braithwaite contend that the approach to solving the problem of unsafe care, Safety I, is flawed and requires a shift in thinking to what they are calling Safety II. We have reservations as to whether by itself the shift from Safety I to Safety II is sufficient. Perhaps our failure to improve outcomes in the field of patient safety and quality lies less in our ap...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013